Number Names

by David C. Wise

If you are impatient and just want to look at the big number names, then you could jump directly to Number Names at the bottom of this page.

But if you were to do that, then you would miss the chance to learn a few things, like what the long and short scales are and why they matter -- at the very least, you would be able to understand the columns of that table of number names at the bottom of this page.


When I worked at Hughes Aircraft Company, Ground Systems Group (GSG), I was given an internal reference publication, An Editor's Guide to Metric Units and Acronyms & Other Letter Symbols at GSG (a few of which are for sale on Amazon at the time of this writing). Remember that this was a decade before public access to the Internet and a decade-and-a-half before Wikipedia, so reference books were very valuable and useful items that you would collect at every opportunity (I have a couple books of tables which still come in handy).

On page 2-12 of my copy (dated 1982, so it might be on a different page in other editions) there's a list of large number names with their values and metric prefixes. Of course you couldn't find names like jillions, zillions, gadzillions, or bajillions, because those simply don't exist; people just make them up because they don't know the large numbers' actual names that we've had since the 15th Century. Instead, the names are derived from the Latin names for numbers with a "-illion" suffix. Very systematic and logical (and described below).

OK, that list does include two made-up numbers, but only because Carl Sagan had just popularized them in the original Cosmos (1980, around the time that the Editor's Guide had been written by engineering types who tend to be professional nerds): the googol (10100) and the googolplex (10googol, also expressed as 1010100).

But then the page's footnote for the "Multiplication Factor" column taught me something I had never known before:

The factors given here are for the U.S. system of naming magnitudes, which progresses upward in sets of 3 zeroes from one thousand to vigintillion. In Europe a totally different system is employed in which 109 is one milliard, 1012 is one billion, and the system continues with the same names as the U.S. system but progressing upward in sets of 6 zeroes, so that vigintillion is 10120.

That footnote planted in my mind the seed of curiosity, but I couldn't really act upon it at the time since I was working for a living, raising a family, and the Internet and Wikipedia had not arrived yet. It turns out that there have been over 20 numbering systems. The two systems used by most of the world are the subject of this page. They have a shared European history (primarily from France) which is complicated by some countries having switched from one to the other and even back to the first one again.

My page examines these events and supporting issues concluding with a fairly comprehensive table of large number names.

I would like to recommend this British YouTube video, though I cover a lot of its content below: How big is a billion? - Numberphile with Dr. James Grime, mathematician.

This is where I learned that the UK had switched numbering systems in 1974 over to the American system, something which British curmudgeons still complain about bitterly. And how the number names make enormous mathematical sense in the original system, but no longer in the American system (which we Americans had originally gotten from the French who then switched back later, but that's too much foreshadowing at this point).

Part of the fallout from that 1974 switch in the UK created a minor crisis in terminology. Up to that point, we in the USA would contrast the "American System" with the "British System", but then when the British System was suddenly the same as the American System, we had to come up with different names, such as "European System". I have no way to confirm that this was the cause of the next development, but in the following year, 1975, a French mathematician, Geneviève Guitel, presented the geographically neutral terminology of long and short scales.

Another resource is the Wikipedia article, Names of large numbers.

Naming Theory

The basic system is fairly simple: construct a number name by prepending "-illion" with a Latin number name, adjusting spelling by reducing "ii" to "i", etc. The Latin number names are based on:

Units Tens Hundreds
1 Un Deci Centi
2 Duo Viginti Ducenti
3 Tre Triginta Trecenti
4 Quattuor Quadraginta Quadringenti
5 Quinqua Quinquaginta Quingenti
6 Se Sexaginta Sescenti
7 Septe Septuaginta Septingenti
8 Octo Octoginta Octingenti
9 Nove Nonaginta Nongenti

For an idea of the possible combinations, here is a list of number name examples with their Arabic numeral equivalents:

2. Billion
3. Trillion
4. Quadrillion
5. Quintillion
6. Sextillion
7. Septillion
8. Octillion
9. Nonillion
10. Decillion
11. Undecillion
12. Duodecillion
20. Vigintillion
32. Duotrigintillion
33. Trestrigintillion
40. Quadragintillion
50. Quinquagintillion
60. Sexagintillion
70. Septuagintillion
80. Octogintillion
86. Sexoctogintillion
90. Nonagintillion
100. Centillion
102. Duocentillion
121. Primo-vigesimo-centillion
133. Trestrigintacentillion
200. Ducentillion
207. Septenducentillion
300. Trecentillion
400. Quadringentillion
500. Quingentillion
600. Sescentillion
700. Septingentillion
800. Octingentillion
806. Sexoctingentillion
900. Nongentillion
1000. Millillion
Assigning Values
Assigning values to these names is fairly simple: to get the next higher number name, multiply the current number name's value by a fixed factor.

That is where we get to a minor complication and source of confusion which is the second theme of this page: the differences between the short scale (AKA "American") and the long scale (AKA "British" (though no longer), "European", "Continental"). The short scale uses a factor of one thousand (1,000) while the long scale uses a factor of one million (1,000,000). If you are working in powers of ten (or just adding zeros, with is equivalent), the multipying by 1,000 is adding three (3) to the exponent (ie, adding three zeros) and the multiplying of 1,000,000 is adding six (6) to the exponent (ie, adding six zeros).

To try to have that make more sense, here are some sequential number names showing their values in terms of powers of ten in both scales:

Name Short
1 Million 106 106
2 Billion 109 1012
3 Trillion 1012 1018
4 Quadrillion 1015 1024
5 Quintillion 1018 1030
6 Sextillion 1021 1036
7 Septillion 1024 1042
8 Octillion 1027 1048
9 Nonillion 1030 1054
10 Decillion 1033 1060

If you want to find the value of a given number name, you do not need to construct the entire list leading up to that name. Instead, you could apply a simple formula given the prefix value of n for that name:

You can verify these methods against the sequential list of names above.

In that list you should have noticed that both scales use the exact same names just with different values. You should have also noticed that while all the values in the long scale are represented in the short scale (or rather you would see that if I had extended the list far enough), about half the values in the short scale appear to have no names in the long scale.

Actually, the long scale does have names for those values; they are just not common in English -- I first heard of "milliard" for the short-scale billion when learning German. While non-English languages lean towards the "-illiard" formulation, when the British were still using the long scale (ie, pre-1974). they would use the form, "thousand <previous number name>".

For example:

Value Short Scale Name Long Scale Name Old British Name
109 Billion Milliard Thousand million
1015 Quadrillion Billiard Thousand billion
1021 Sextillion Trilliard Thousand trillion
1027 Octillion Quadrilliard Thousand quadrillion
1033 Decillion Quintilliard Thousand quintillion

I've complied a more complete table at the bottom of this page.


Fortunately, the International Standard (SI) values of metric prefixes are not affected by which scale is being used; eg:

ValueShort Scale NameLong Scale NameSI SymbolSI Prefix



There are about 20 native numbering systems in use in the world, but most of the world uses one or both variants of the European system, which are the subject of this page.

The first attempt at devising large number names appears to have been by 15th century French mathematician Jehan Adam who was secretary to Nicholle Tilhart, notary, secretary and auditor of accounts to King Louis XI of France. Jehan Adam published a manuscript in 1475 containing the first use of the terms "bymillion" and "trimillion", which gave rise to the modern terms billion and trillion. Their values were 1012 and 1018, respectively, which correspond to the long scale values for billion and trillion.

Jehan Adam's work appears to have been extended by French mathematician Nicolas Chuquet in his 1484 article, Triparty en la science des nombres, for which he is credited with creating the basis of our current system. However, that article was not published until it was rediscovered in 1880, so its contents were only known about through Estienne de La Roche's 1520 textbook, l'Arismetique, in which he copied Chuquet's system without attribution.

Chuquet's system was basically as I have described in the previous section. The names are based on prefixes constructed from Latin number names attached to the suffix, "-illion" and their values are the result of raising a million to the power of the value of the prefix (again, as described in the section above). Another less mathematical way to describe the system is that each sequential number name's value is one million times greater than the previous name's value.

Chuquet's system has been expanded upon since then. Jacques Pelletier du Mans (1517 – 1582) added names for the intermediate values; eg:

As a result, the long scale is also known as the Chuquet-Peletier system.

In the 17th century, usage of large numbers caused the assignment of values to vary, such that billion came to mean 109 instead of the original 1012. That usage was brought to the American colonies where it is still used today.

By early in the 18th century, France had completely switched over the the short scale, calling the Chuquet-Peletier system the "now obsolete system". But then in 1948, France switched back to the long scale, making that move official in 1961. Conversely, the UK, which had been using the long scale, switched over to the short scale in 1974. Most other English-speaking countries followed suit shortly thereafter, though the official status of the short scale is not always clear.

All these changes created a minor naming crisis for us (ie, the USA). We had fallen into the habit of calling our system the "American System" and the other the "British System," or alternatively the "European System." But now that the UK had switched over to the "American System", we could no longer refer to the "British System", now could we? It almost feels like it was in response to that problem that yet another French mathematician, Geneviève Guitel, came up with a new naming convention of the long and short scales, a nomenclature which I have been using on this page.

The Wikipedia page on the long and short scales lists which countries use which. For the most part, usage follows language as well as colonial pasts, such that most countries use the system of the mother country. Even when the mother country has switched systems (eg, the UK, France), countries that use the same language tend to switch as well, likely because of ongoing communication and commerce with each other. There are also seven (7) countries using both systems because they straddle or encompass two cultures (eg, Canada and Puerto Rico). And due to the US dollar's traditional dominance in the financial world, the short scale was adopted for official United Nations documents.

Now the Internet makes it more important that we be clear about which scale we are using. When we read or write "billion", we can no longer assume that everybody will know what we mean. For that reason, on my other pages which use that number I try to make it clear that I'm using the short scale by explicitly giving the value of billion as 109.

Fortunately, the values of metric prefixes are not affected by which scale is being used. So "giga-" will always be 109, "nano-" always 10-9, "kilo-" always 103, and "peta-" always 1015.


Number Names

Here is a more complete table which I copied from somewhere of large number names and their values.
Base -illion
(short scale)
Base -illion
(long scale)
ValueUS, Canada and modern British
(short scale)
Traditional British
(long scale)
Traditional European (Peletier)
(long scale)
21109BillionThousand millionMilliard
421015QuadrillionThousand billionBilliard
631021SextillionThousand trillionTrilliard
841027OctillionThousand quadrillionQuadrilliard
1051033DecillionThousand quintillionQuintilliard
1261039DuodecillionThousand sextillionSextilliard
1471045QuattuordecillionThousand septillionSeptilliard
1681051SedecillionThousand octillionOctilliard
1891057OctodecillionThousand nonillionNonilliard
20101063VigintillionThousand decillionDecilliard
22111069DuovigintillionThousand undecillionUndecilliard
24121075QuattuorvigintillionThousand duodecillionDuodecilliard
26131081SesvigintillionThousand tredecillionTredecilliard
28141087OctovigintillionThousand quattuordecillionQuattuordecilliard
30151093TrigintillionThousand quindecillionQuindecilliard
32161099DuotrigintillionThousand sedecillionSedecilliard
341710105QuattuortrigintillionThousand septendecillionSeptendecilliard
361810111SestrigintillionThousand octodecillionOctodecilliard
381910117OctotrigintillionThousand novendecillionNovendecilliard
402010123QuadragintillionThousand vigintillionVigintilliard
502510153QuinquagintillionThousand quinquavigintillionQuinquavigintilliard
603010183SexagintillionThousand trigintillionTrigintilliard
703510213SeptuagintillionThousand quinquatrigintillionQuinquatrigintilliard
804010243OctogintillionThousand quadragintillionQuadragintilliard
904510273NonagintillionThousand quinquaquadragintillionQuinquaquadragintilliard
1005010303CentillionThousand quinquagintillionQuinquagintilliard
1025110309DuocentillionThousand unquinquagintillionUnquinquagintilliard
1105510333DecicentillionThousand quinquaquinquagintillionQuinquaquinquagintilliard
1206010363ViginticentillionThousand sexagintillionSexagintilliard
1306510393TrigintacentillionThousand quinquasexagintillionQuinquasexagintilliard
1407010423QuadragintacentillionThousand septuagintillionSeptuagintilliard
1507510453QuinquagintacentillionThousand quinquaseptuagintillionQuinquaseptuagintilliard
1608010483SexagintacentillionThousand octogintillionOctogintilliard
1708510513SeptuagintacentillionThousand quinquaoctogintillionQuinquaoctogintilliard
1809010543OctogintacentillionThousand nonagintillionNonagintilliard
1909510573NonagintacentillionThousand quinquanonagintillionQuinquanonagintilliard
20010010603DucentillionThousand centillionCentilliard
30015010903TrecentillionThousand quinquagintacentillionQuinquagintacentilliard
400200101203QuadringentillionThousand ducentillionDucentilliard
500250101503QuingentillionThousand quinquagintaducentillionQuinquagintaducentilliard
600300101803SescentillionThousand trecentillionTrecentilliard
700350102103SeptingentillionThousand quinquagintatrecentillionQuinquagintatrecentilliard
800400102403OctingentillionThousand quadringentillionQuadringentilliard
900450102703NongentillionThousand quinquagintaquadringentillionQuinquagintaquadringentilliard
1000500103003MillinillionThousand quingentillionQuingentilliard

Return to Top of Page
Return to DWise1's Home Page

Share and enjoy!

First uploaded on 2019 July 08.
Updated on 2020 January 02.

E-Mail Address: