Going through my old emails the other day 1, I found this one from 2003 September 19 which repeated a humor page posted at Calvin College, a conservative Christian college. The email provided a URL for that page which surprisingly is still there, last updated 1999 March 19.
In Spring 1999, Deborah and Loren Haarsma were invited to teach a series of 10 seminars, Science and Spirituality: Is Harmony Possible?. Along with links to the class notes for each of the seminars, they included a link to this humor file. And if you are interested in the relationship between science and religion, you should find their notes and their own web site, Christian faith and science, to be of some interest.
I am reposting that humor file as I had received it in that email. The only changes I have made to it was to format it via HTML, which I feel makes it more readable than the original referred to (which itself is undoubtedly a copy of a more original original, etc). You can view the original we worked from at http://www.calvin.edu/~lhaarsma/hermeneutics_humor.html.
Share and enjoy!
A side-effect of this approach was the creation of an archive of all the content I had read and written on CompuServe, which became a valuable research resource.
I extended that practice to my activities on other forums as well as to my emails.
That habit became absolutely necessary in an email correspondence with a creationist who would lie about everything and anything including what we had said, so half the time I had to copy-and-paste from our emails in order to correct him.
I first went on-line in the late 1980's with CompuServe to which you connected via a phone modem (300 to 2400 baud, as I recall) and charged you for that connect time by the minute.
I very quickly learned to minimize that cost by minimizing the time that I was actually connected.
My terminal emulator software allowed me to capture incoming traffic to a text file (ASCII) and to stream a text file as if it were keyboard input. So I would capture messages while on-line, then read them and write my responses at my leisure off-line. Then the next time I went on-line I would stream my responses and capture more content to read and respond to off-line.
Not only did it keep my CompuServe costs down, but it also freed up the family phone that much sooner.
A side-effect of this approach was the creation of an archive of all the content I had read and written on CompuServe, which became a valuable research resource. I extended that practice to my activities on other forums as well as to my emails. That habit became absolutely necessary in an email correspondence with a creationist who would lie about everything and anything including what we had said, so half the time I had to copy-and-paste from our emails in order to correct him.
Suppose you're traveling to work and you see a stop sign. What do you do? That depends on how you exegete the stop sign.
- A postmodernist deconstructs the sign (knocks it over with his car), ending forever the tyranny of the north-south traffic over the east-west traffic.
- Similarly, a Marxist sees a stop sign as an instrument of class conflict. He concludes that the bourgeoisie use the north-south road and obstruct the progress of the workers on the east-west road.
- A serious and educated Catholic believes that he cannot understand the stop sign apart from its interpretive community and their tradition. Observing that the interpretive community doesn't take it too seriously, he doesn't feel obligated to take it too seriously either.
- An average Catholic (or Orthodox or Coptic or Anglican or Methodist or Presbyterian or whatever) doesn't bother to read the sign but he'll stop if the car in front of him does.
- A fundamentalist, taking the text very literally, stops at the stop sign and waits for it to tell him to go.
- A preacher might look up "STOP" in his lexicons of English and discover that it can mean:
The main point of his sermon the following Sunday on this text is: when you see a stop sign, it is a place where traffic is naturally clogged, so it is a good place to let off passengers from your car.
- something which prevents motion, such as a plug for a drain, or a block of wood that prevents a door from closing;
- a location where a train or bus lets off passengers.
- An orthodox Jew does one of two things:
- Take another route to work that doesn't have a stop sign so that he doesn't run the risk of disobeying the Law.
- Stop at the stop sign, say "Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, king of the universe, who hast given us thy commandment to stop," wait 3 seconds according to his watch, and then proceed.
Incidentally, the Talmud has the following comments on this passage:
- R[abbi] Meir says:
- He who does not stop shall not live long.
- R. Hillel says:
- Cursed is he who does not count to three before proceeding.
- R. Simon ben Yudah says:
- Why three? Because the Holy One, blessed be He, gave us the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings.
- R. ben Isaac says:
- Because of the three patriarchs.
- R. Yehuda says:
- Why bless the Lord at a stop sign? Because it says: "Be still, and know that I am God."
- R. Hezekiel says:
- When Jephthah returned from defeating the Ammonites, the Holy One, blessed be He, knew that a donkey would run out of the house and overtake his daughter; but Jephthah did not stop at the stop sign, and the donkey did not have time to come out. For this reason he saw his daughter first and lost her. Thus he was judged for his transgression at the stop sign.
- R. Gamaliel says:
- R. Hillel, when he was a baby, never spoke a word, though his parents tried to teach him by speaking and showing him the words on a scroll. One day his father was driving through town and did not stop at the sign. Young Hillel called out: "Stop, father!" In this way, he began reading and speaking at the same time. Thus it is written: "Out of the mouth of babes."
- R. ben Jacob says:
- Where did the stop sign come from? Out of the sky, for it is written: "Forever, O Lord, your word is fixed in the heavens."
- R. ben Nathan says:
- When were stop signs created? On the fourth day, for it is written: "let them serve as signs."
- R. Yeshuah says:
- ... [continues for three more pages]
- A Pharisee does the same thing as an orthodox Jew, except that he waits 10 seconds instead of 3. He also replaces his brake lights with 1000 watt searchlights and connects his horn so that it is activated whenever he touches the brake pedal.
- A scholar from Jesus seminar concludes that the passage "STOP" undoubtedly was never uttered by Jesus himself, but belongs entirely to stage III of the gospel tradition, when the church was first confronted by traffic in its parking lot.
- A NT scholar notices that there is no stop sign on Mark street but there is one on Matthew and Luke streets, and concludes that the ones on Luke and Matthew streets are both copied from a sign on a completely hypothetical street called "Q". There is an excellent 300 page discussion of speculations on the origin of these stop signs and the differences between the stop signs on Matthew and Luke street in the scholar's commentary on the passage. There is an unfortunately omission in the commentary, however; the author apparently forgot to explain what the text means.
- An OT scholar points out that there are a number of stylistic differences between the first and second half of the passage "STOP". For example, "ST" contains no enclosed areas and 5 line endings, whereas "OP" contains two enclosed areas and only one line termination. He concludes that the author for the second part is different from the author for the first part and probably lived hundreds of years later. Later scholars determine that the second half is itself actually written by two separate authors because of similar stylistic differences between the "O" and the "P".
- Another prominent OT scholar notes in his commentary that the stop sign would fit better into the context three streets back. (Unfortunately, he neglected to explain why in his commentary.) Clearly it was moved to its present location by a later redactor. He thus exegetes the intersection as though the stop sign were not there.
- Because of the difficulties in interpretation, another OT scholar emends the text, changing "T" to "H". "SHOP" is much easier to understand in context than "STOP" because of the multiplicity of stores in the area. The textual corruption probably occurred because "SHOP" is so similar to "STOP" on the sign several streets back that it is a natural mistake for a scribe to make. Thus the sign should be interpreted to announce the existence of a shopping area.
- A "prophetic" preacher notices that the square root of the sum of the numeric representations of the letters S-T-O-P (sigma-tau-omicron-pi in the Greek alphabet), multiplied by 40 (the number of testing), and divided by four (the number of the world--north, south, east, and west), equals 666. Therefore, he concludes that stop signs are the dreaded "mark of the beast," a harbinger of divine judgment upon the world, and must be avoided at all costs.
- The chicken didn't see the stop sign, and crossed the road.
Share and enjoy!
Return to Top of Page
Return to DWise1's Home Page
First uploaded on 2017 January 12.